Though written about the California payphone situation,
this San Francisco Bay Guardian article struck a chord in me.
I've noticed as I walk around Minneapolis that many if not most of the payphones I used to rely on in 1999 are no longer available. Two months ago, two of the payphones I used to use in the LynLake area were gone, which had both been there earlier in the year.
I don't own a cell phone, and so I am more aware of this problem than most of my friends. Because I am an innocuous white female, I have been able to make emergency local calls from small businesses kind enough to share their phones a few times. But more and more, once I leave the house I am unable to call friends to check in or make plans. This is especially inconvenient, as cell-phone carrying friends will not commit to firm meeting times and locations in advance.
I can afford a landline, so I am not in the position of many of the poor folks described in the article. But I do think it's a shame. It used to be an assumption that if you were in a public place such as a hotel, museum, airport, gas station, etc, that there would be at least one convenient pay phone for you to use. Gas station pay phones were especially necessary for stranded motorists.
Now, that assumption has faded, replaced by the assumption that it is the individual's responsibility to purchase a cell phone with a calling card or plan for automotive emergencies. Many gas stations no longer have payphones. The reason I have most often heard involves loitering or drug dealing or similar, for removal of all payphones. I don't believe this, as I suspect that the majority of drug dealers have the cash for cell phones. Whatever the reason, it's a change I resent and would love to see reversed.